Skip Navigation



Tree Physiology Advance Access published online on December 19, 2008

Tree Physiology, doi:10.1093/treephys/tpn024
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
29/2/261    most recent
tpn024v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Woodruff, D.R.
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, D.M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Woodruff, D.R.
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, D.M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Coordination of leaf structure and gas exchange along a height gradient in a tall conifer

D.R. Woodruff1,2, F.C. Meinzer1, B. Lachenbruch3 and D.M. Johnson1

1 USDA Forest Service, Forestry Sciences Laboratory, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA
2 Corresponding author (david.woodruff{at}oregonstate.edu)
3 Department of Wood Science and Engineering, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA


   Abstract

The gravitational component of water potential and frictional resistance during transpiration lead to substantial reductions in leaf water potential ({Psi}l) near the tops of tall trees, which can influence both leaf growth and physiology. We examined the relationships between morphological features and gas exchange in foliage collected near the tops of Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb.) Franco) trees of different height classes ranging from 5 to 55 m. This sampling allowed us to investigate the effects of tree height on leaf structural characteristics in the absence of potentially confounding factors such as irradiance, temperature, relative humidity and branch length. The use of cut foliage for measurement of intrinsic gas-exchange characteristics allowed identification of height-related trends without the immediate influences of path length and gravity. Stomatal density, needle length, needle width and needle area declined with increasing tree height by 0.70 mm–2 m–1, 0.20 mm m–1, 5.9 x 10–3 mm m–1 and 0.012 mm2 m–1, respectively. Needle thickness and mesophyll thickness increased with tree height by 4.8 x 10–2 mm m–1 and 0.74 µm m–1, respectively. Mesophyll conductance (gm) and CO2 assimilation in ambient [CO2] (Aamb) decreased by 1.1 mmol m–2 s–1 per m and 0.082 µmol m–2 s–1 per m increase in height, respectively. Mean reductions in gm and Aamb of foliage from 5 to 55 m were 47% and 42%, respectively. The observed trend in Aamb was associated with gm and several leaf anatomic characteristics that are likely to be determined by the prevailing vertical tension gradient during foliar development. A linear increase in foliar {delta}13C values with height (0.042{per thousand} m–1) implied that relative stomatal and mesophyll limitations of photosynthesis in intact shoots increased with height. These data suggest that increasing height leads to both fixed structural constraints on leaf gas exchange and dynamic constraints related to prevailing stomatal behavior.

Keywords: growth limitation, leaf anatomy, mesophyll conductance, photosynthesis, Pseudotsuga menziesii

Received June 6, 2008; Accepted October 3, 2008


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
D. R. Woodruff, F. C. Meinzer, and K. A. McCulloh
Height-related trends in stomatal sensitivity to leaf-to-air vapour pressure deficit in a tall conifer
J. Exp. Bot., November 23, 2009; (2009) erp291v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.