Skip Navigation


Tree Physiology Advance Access originally published online on May 29, 2009
Tree Physiology 2009 29(8):975-987; doi:10.1093/treephys/tpp036
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
29/8/975    most recent
tpp036v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dillen, S. Y.
Right arrow Articles by Bastien, C.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dillen, S. Y.
Right arrow Articles by Bastien, C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Relationships among productivity determinants in two hybrid poplar families grown during three years at two contrasting sites

Sophie Y. Dillen1,2, Nicolas Marron1,*, Maurizio Sabatti3, Reinhart Ceulemans1 and Catherine Bastien4

1 Research Group of Plant and Vegetation Ecology, Department of Biology, University of Antwerp, Campus Drie Eiken, Universiteitsplein 1, 2610 Wilrijk, Belgium
2 Corresponding author (Sophie.Dillen{at}ua.ac.be)
3 Department of Forest Environment and Resources (DISAFRI), Università degli Studi della Tuscia, Via S. Camillo de Lellis, 01100 Viterbo, Italy
4 INRA, Unité Amélioration, Génétique et Physiologie Forestières, BP 20619, Ardon, 45166 Olivet Cedex, France


   Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate the environmental, temporal and genetic stability of the relationships between growth and a selection of tree architectural, leaf and phenological traits (selection based on the conclusions of previous studies carried out on the same experimental trial). Therefore, the growth of two hybrid families, Populus deltoides ‘S9-2’ x Populus nigra ‘Ghoy’ (D x N family, 180 F1) and P. deltoides ‘S9-2’ x Populus trichocarpa ‘V24’ (D x T family, 182 F1), was investigated during a 3-year period at two sites, i.e., in northern Italy and central France. At the end of the second growing season, all trees were coppiced and the resprouts were thinned to a single stem. At the end of each growing season, stem circumference and height were measured for all F1 hybrids. The number of sylleptic branches, individual leaf area (LA) and petiole length of the largest leaf along the main stem, production of new leaves, bud flush and bud set were estimated for a selection of genotypes (31 F1) per family at each site during the course of the 3-year experiment. The D x T family was clearly the most productive family and displayed the highest heterosis values. However, there appeared to be a compromise between good growth at a given site and stability between the two different sites, both at family and at genotype levels. Particularly, the less performing trees were stable between Italy and France. Among the studied growth components, the number of sylleptic branches and individual LA of the largest leaf along the main stem were the best growth predictors, irrespective of site and family. Growth strategies in terms of leaf development differed between the two families. Hence, leaf production rate was strongly associated with growth of the D x N family only. These results have important consequences for the use of the studied traits as selection criteria in breeding programmes.

Keywords: genotypex environment interaction, growth determinants, heritability, heterosis, petiole, phenology, Populus, syllepsis, time stability

Received December 17, 2008; Accepted May 7, 2009


* Present address: UMR 1137 INRA-UHP Écologie et Écophysiologie Forestières, 54280 Champenoux, France.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.