Skip Navigation


Tree Physiology Advance Access originally published online on April 7, 2009
Tree Physiology 2009 29(7):921-926; doi:10.1093/treephys/tpp021
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
29/7/921    most recent
tpp021v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nishikawa, F.
Right arrow Articles by Omura, M.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nishikawa, F.
Right arrow Articles by Omura, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Differences in seasonal expression of flowering genes between deciduous trifoliate orange and evergreen Satsuma mandarin

Fumie Nishikawa1,2, Tomoko Endo1, Takehiko Shimada1, Hiroshi Fujii1, Tokurou Shimizu1 and Mitsuo Omura3

1 Okitsu Citrus Research Station, National Institute of Fruit Tree Science, National Agricultural Research Organization, 424-0292 Okitsu Shimizu-ku, Shizuoka, Japan
2 Corresponding author (fumien{at}affrc.go.jp)
3 Department of Biological Sciences, Shizuoka University, 422-8529 Ohya, Shizuoka, Japan


   Abstract

To determine differences in seasonal flowering between evergreen and deciduous woody perennials, endogenous expression of flowering-related genes was investigated in Satsuma mandarin (Citrus unshiu Marc.) and its close relative, trifoliate orange (Poncirus trifoliata (L.) Raf.), which are evergreen and deciduous, respectively, and show different seasonal flowering characteristics. In Satsuma mandarin, in which floral induction is triggered by low temperatures during fall and winter, mRNA levels of the citrus FLOWERING LOCUS T homologue CiFT increased during fall and winter, corresponding to the floral induction period, and mRNA levels of citrus LEAFY and SEPALLATA homologues (CsLFY and CuSEP) increased during early spring just before blooming. Citrus APETALA1 and FRUITFULL homologues (CsAP1 and CuFUL) did not show a significant association with seasonal flowering. In trifoliate orange, in which floral induction and flower bud development occur during early summer as in many deciduous trees, expression of CiFT, CsLFY, CsAP1, CuSEPs and CuFUL increased during early summer, corresponding to the period of floral induction and flower bud development. The CuSEPs expression peaked again during early spring just before blooming. In both species, the citrus TERMINAL FLOWER1 homologue (CsTFL), which acts as a floral repressor, showed low transcript levels during the period of floral induction and flower bud development. Thus, despite the difference in flowering season, in both species transcriptional changes in CiFT, CsLFY, CsTFL and CuSEPs were correlated with seasonal flowering. In contrast, the correspondence between CsAP1 and CuFUL expression and seasonal flowering differed between the species.

Keywords: citrus, Citrus unshiu, floral induction, floral repressor, flower bud development, FT, Poncirus trifoliate, seasonal flowering

Received September 25, 2008; Accepted March 16, 2009


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.