Skip Navigation


Tree Physiology Advance Access originally published online on February 9, 2009
Tree Physiology 2009 29(4):587-605; doi:10.1093/treephys/tpn051
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary Data
Right arrow Supplementary Data
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
29/4/587    most recent
tpn051v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ogle, K.
Right arrow Articles by Pacala, S. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ogle, K.
Right arrow Articles by Pacala, S. W.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

A modeling framework for inferring tree growth and allocation from physiological, morphological and allometric traits

Kiona Ogle1,2 and Stephen W. Pacala3

1 Departments of Botany and Statistics, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY 82071, USA
2 Corresponding author (kogle{at}uwyo.edu)
3 Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA


   Abstract

Predictions of forest succession, diversity and function require an understanding of how species differ in their growth, allocation patterns and susceptibility to mortality. These processes in turn are affected by allometric constraints and the physiological state of the tree, both of which are coupled to the tree’s labile carbon status. Ultimately, insight into the hidden labile pools and the processes affecting the allocation of labile carbon to storage, maintenance and growth will improve our ability to predict tree growth, mortality and forest dynamics. We developed the ‘Allometrically Constrained Growth and Carbon Allocation’ (ACGCA) model that explicitly couples tree growth, mortality, allometries and labile carbon. This coupling results in (1) a semi-mechanistic basis for predicting tree death, (2) an allocation scheme that simultaneously satisfies allometric relationships and physiology-based carbon dynamics and (3) a range of physiological states that are consistent with tree behavior (e.g., healthy, static, shrinking, recovering, recovered and dead). We present the ACGCA model and illustrate aspects of its behavior by conducting simulations under different forest gap dynamics scenarios and with parameter values obtained for two ecologically dissimilar species: loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) and red maple (Acer rubrum L.). The model reproduces growth and mortality patterns of these species that are consistent with their shade-tolerance and succession status. The ACGCA framework provides an alternative, and potentially improved, approach for predicting tree growth, mortality and forest dynamics.

Keywords: Acer rubrum, carbon allocation, carbon reserves, carbon storage, growth model, labile carbon, loblolly pine, Pinus taeda, red maple, retranslocation, shade-tolerance, succession, tree mortality

Received March 31, 2006; Accepted November 15, 2008


Supplementary Data

Supplementary data for this article are available at Tree Physiology Online.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.