Skip Navigation


Tree Physiology Advance Access originally published online on December 5, 2008
Tree Physiology 2009 29(2):207-216; doi:10.1093/treephys/tpn017
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
29/2/207    most recent
tpn017v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Roitto, M.
Right arrow Articles by Tuomi, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Roitto, M.
Right arrow Articles by Tuomi, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Induced accumulation of phenolics and sawfly performance in Scots pine in response to previous defoliation

Marja Roitto1,2, Pasi Rautio3, Annamari Markkola1, Riitta Julkunen-tiitto4, Martti Varama5, Karita Saravesi1 and Juha Tuomi1

1 Department of Biology, University of Oulu, P.O. Box 3000, FIN-90014 Oulu, Finland
2 Corresponding author (mroitto{at}saunalahti.fi)
3 Finnish Forest Research Institute, Kaironiementie 54, FIN-39700 Parkano, Finland
4 Department of Biology, University of Joensuu, P.O. Box 111, FIN-80101 Joensuu, Finland
5 Finnish Forest Research Institute, P.O. Box 18, FIN-01301 Vantaa, Finland


   Abstract

Phenolic compounds often accumulate in foliar tissues of deciduous woody plants in response to previous insect defoliation, but similar responses have been observed infrequently in evergreen conifers. We studied the effects of defoliation on the foliar chemistry of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) and cocoon mass, and survival of the pine sawfly (Diprion pini L.). In two successive years, needles were excised early in the season leaving only the current-year shoot intact (defoliated trees); untreated entire shoots served as controls (control trees). A year after the second defoliation, pine sawfly larvae were transferred to the trees. Delayed induced resistance in Scots pine in response to defoliation was indicated by (1) reduced cocoon mass in defoliated trees and (2) increased concentrations of phenolics and soluble condensed tannins in the foliage of defoliated trees compared with controls. Myricetin-3-galactoside, which showed the strongest induced response (104% and 71% increase in current-year (C) and previous-year (C+1) needles) of the compounds analyzed, also entered the regression model explaining variation in sawfly performance. Other compounds that entered the model, e.g., (+)-catechin, showed weaker responses to defoliation than myricetin-3-galactoside. Hyperin, condensed tannins and quercitrin showed strong induced responses in C or C+1 needles, or both, but these compounds did not explain the variation in sawfly performance. Accumulation of phenolics is sometimes associated with the reduced foliage nitrogen (N) concentrations in deciduous trees, and our results suggest that this may also be the case in evergreen conifers. Based on the earlier findings that defoliation reduces needle N concentration and N deficiency results in the accumulation of the same phenolic compounds, i.e., myricetin and quercetin glycosides, and soluble condensed tannins, we suggest that the accumulation of phenolics in defoliated trees occurred in response to the reduced foliar N concentration.

Keywords: Diprion pini, herbivory, induced resistance, Pinus sylvestris

Received May 28, 2008; Accepted August 29, 2008


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.