Skip Navigation


Tree Physiology Advance Access originally published online on December 3, 2008
Tree Physiology 2009 29(1):53-66; doi:10.1093/treephys/tpn005
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
29/1/53    most recent
tpn005v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Häikiö, E.
Right arrow Articles by Oksanen, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Häikiö, E.
Right arrow Articles by Oksanen, E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Differences in leaf characteristics between ozone-sensitive and ozone-tolerant hybrid aspen (Populus tremula x Populus tremuloides) clones

Elina Häikiö1,2, Vera Freiwald1, Riitta Julkunen-Tiitto3, Egbert Beuker4, Toini Holopainen1 and Elina Oksanen3

1 Department of Environmental Science, University of Kuopio, P.O. Box 1627, FI-70211 Kuopio, Finland
2 Corresponding author (elina.haikio{at}uku.fi)
3 Faculty of Biosciences, University of Joensuu, P.O. Box 111, FI-80101 Joensuu, Finland
4 Finnish Forest Research Institute, Punkaharju Research Unit, Finlandiantie 18, FI-58450 Punkaharju, Finland


   Abstract

The authors analyzed a suite of leaf characteristics that might help to explain the difference between ozone-sensitive and ozone-tolerant hybrid aspen (Populus tremula L. x Populus tremuloides Michx.) clones. An open-field experiment comprising ambient ozone and 1.5x ambient ozone concentration (about 35 ppb) and two soil nitrogen regimes (60 and 140 kg N ha–1 year–1) was conducted over two growing seasons on potted plants of eight hybrid aspen clones. Four of the clones had previously been determined to be ozone sensitive based on impaired growth in response to elevated ozone concentration. Photosynthetic rate, chlorophyll fluorescence, and concentrations of chlorophyll, protein and carbohydrates were analyzed three times during the second growing season, and foliar phenolic concentrations were measured at the end of the second growing season. Nitrogen amendment counteracted the effects of ozone, but had no effect on growth-related ozone sensitivity of the clones. Ozone-sensitive clones had higher photosynthetic capacity and higher concentrations of Rubisco and phenolics than ozone-tolerant clones, but the effects of ozone were similar in the sensitive and tolerant groups. Nitrogen addition had no effect on phenolic concentration, but elevated ozone concentration increased the concentrations of chlorogenic acid and (+)-catechin. This study suggests that condensed tannins and catechin, but not salicylates or flavonol glycosides, play a role in the ozone tolerance of hybrid aspen.

Keywords: chlorophyll, flavonoids, nitrogen, phenolics, photosynthesis, Rubisco, salicylates, senescence, sensitivity

Received April 22, 2008; Accepted August 24, 2008


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Tree PhysiolHome page
K. Hartikainen, A.-m. Nerg, M. Kivimaenpaa, S. Kontunen-soppela, M. Maenpaa, E. Oksanen, M. Rousi, and T. Holopainen
Emissions of volatile organic compounds and leaf structural characteristics of European aspen (Populus tremula) grown under elevated ozone and temperature
Tree Physiol, September 1, 2009; 29(9): 1163 - 1173.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.