Skip Navigation


Tree Physiology Advance Access originally published online on July 16, 2009
Tree Physiology 2009 29(9):1143-1151; doi:10.1093/treephys/tpp051
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
29/9/1143    most recent
tpp051v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bown, H. E.
Right arrow Articles by Whitehead, D.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bown, H. E.
Right arrow Articles by Whitehead, D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

The influence of nitrogen and phosphorus supply and genotype on mesophyll conductance limitations to photosynthesis in Pinus radiata

Horacio E. Bown1,2, Michael S. Watt3, Euan G. Mason4, Peter W. Clinton3 and David Whitehead5

1 Faculty of Forestry, University of Chile, P.O. Box 9206, Santiago, Chile
2 Corresponding author (hbown{at}uchile.cl)
3 Scion, P.O. Box 29237, Christchurch, New Zealand
4 School of Forestry, University of Canterbury, Private Bag 4800, Christchurch, New Zealand
5 Landcare Research, P.O. Box 40, Lincoln 7640, Christchurch, New Zealand


   Abstract

Mesophyll conductance, gm, may pose significant limitations to photosynthesis and may be differentially affected by nutrition and genotype in Pinus radiata D. Don. Simultaneous measurements of gas exchange and chlorophyll fluorescence were made to determine gm, using the constant J method (Harley, P.C., F. Loreto, G. Di Marco and T.D. Sharkey. 1992. Theoretical considerations when estimating the mesophyll conductance to CO2 flux by analysis of the response of photosynthesis to CO2. Plant Physiol. 98:1429–1436), in a fast- and a slow-growing clone of P. radiata grown in a greenhouse with a factorial combination of nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) supply. Values of gm increased linearly with the rate of photosynthesis at saturating irradiance and ambient CO2 concentration, Asat (gm = 0.020Asat, r2 = 0.25, P < 0.001) and with stomatal conductance to CO2 transfer, gs (gm = 1.16gs, r2 = 0.14, P < 0.001). Values of gm were greater than those of stomatal conductance, gs, and the ratio (gm/gs) was not influenced by single or combined N and P additions or clone with a mean (±SE) value of 1.22 ± 0.06. Relative limitations to mesophyll conductance, Lm (16%) to photosynthesis, were generally greater than those imposed by stomata, Ls (13%). The mean (±SE) CO2 concentration in the intercellular air spaces (Ci) was 53 ± 3 µmol mol–1 lower than that in the atmosphere (Ca). Mean (±SE) CO2 concentration in the chloroplasts (Cc) was 48 ± 2 µmol mol–1 lower than Ci. Values of Ls, Lm and CO2 diffusion gradients posed by gs (Ca – Ci) and gm (Ci – Cc) did not significantly differ with nutrient supply or clone. Mean values of Vcmax and Jmax calculated on a Cc basis were 15.4% and 3.1% greater than those calculated on a Ci basis, which translated into different slopes of the Jmax/Vcmax relationship (Cc basis: Jmax = 2.11Vcmax, r2 = 0.88, P < 0.001; Ci basis: Jmax = 2.43Vcmax, r2 = 0.86, P < 0.001). These results will be useful for correcting estimates of Vcmax and Jmax used to characterize the biochemical properties of photosynthesis for P. radiata.

Keywords: chloroplastic CO2 concentration, electron transport, nutrient limitation, Rubisco carboxylation, stomatal limitation

Received May 12, 2009; Accepted June 25, 2009


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.