Skip Navigation


Tree Physiology Advance Access originally published online on April 27, 2009
Tree Physiology 2009 29(6):809-818; doi:10.1093/treephys/tpp025
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Movies
Right arrow Movies
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
29/6/809    most recent
tpp025v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pina, A.
Right arrow Articles by Martens, H. J.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pina, A.
Right arrow Articles by Martens, H. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Cell-to-cell transport through plasmodesmata in tree callus cultures

Ana Pina1,2, Pilar Errea1, Alexander Schulz2 and Helle J. Martens2,3

1 Unidad de Fruticultura, CITA-DGA, Avda de Montañana 930, 50059 Zaragoza, Spain
2 Department of Plant Biology and Biotechnology, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Thorvaldsensvej 40, DK-1871 Frederiksberg C, Denmark
3 Corresponding author (hjm{at}life.ku.dk)


   Abstract

One factor that contributes to a successful fruit tree grafting is the establishment of symplasmic contacts in the graft interface to facilitate the transfer of compounds between scion and stock. Using novel experimental and theoretical approaches we investigated whether the localized incompatibility, experienced in some Prunus grafts, could be related to insufficient plasmodesmal coupling at an early stage of development within one of the partners. Dye-coupling analysis using fluorescent tracers combined with confocal laser scanning microscopy were performed in cultured callus from either the plum rootstock (Prunus cerasifera Ehrh. x Prunus munsoniana W. Wight et Hedr.) cv. ‘Marianna 2624’ or from the apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.) cv. ‘Moniqui’ growing in vitro. Fluorescein was loaded into callus cells in a caged form. Following photoactivation of fluorescence within single cells, the uncaged fluorescein could be traced as it was spreading cell-to-cell revealing the existence of functional plasmodesmata. This set of experiments was performed within the ‘stock’ partner in callus fusions (‘callus grafts’) as well as in ungrafted callus. The results indicated species-related as well as developmental-related differences in plasmodesmal conductivity. The results further pointed to a novel control factor of connectivity that reaches the graft partner and changes its innate rate of communication: when combining the poorly transporting apricot cultivar with the well-transporting plum cultivar, communication between plum callus cells was much reduced, compared to that in plum homografts. For further support of the hypothesis, we carried out a quantitative analysis in which fluorescein was esterloaded into the callus. Fluorescence redistribution after photobleaching of fluorescein in individual cells gave a measure for the plasmodesmal contact between the cells. We found significant differences between the species with regard to mobile fraction and halftime of redistribution, which confirmed that callus cells are not interconnected to the same extent in Marianna 2624 and Moniqui.

Keywords: callus fusion, grafting, photoactivation, photobleaching, Prunus, size-exclusion limit, symplasmic domains

Received April 24, 2008; Accepted January 6, 2009


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.