Skip Navigation


Tree Physiology Advance Access originally published online on August 20, 2009
Tree Physiology 2009 29(10):1247-1257; doi:10.1093/treephys/tpp056
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
29/10/1247    most recent
tpp056v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schneuwly, D. M.
Right arrow Articles by Berger, F.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schneuwly, D. M.
Right arrow Articles by Berger, F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Three-dimensional analysis of the anatomical growth response of European conifers to mechanical disturbance

Dominique M. Schneuwly1,2, Markus Stoffel1,3,4, Luuk K.A. Dorren5 and Frédéric Berger6

1 Department of Geosciences, Geography, University of Fribourg, Chemin du Musée 4, CH-1700 Fribourg, Switzerland
2 Corresponding author (dominique.schneuwly{at}unifr.ch)
3 Laboratory of Dendrogeomorphology, Institute of Geological Sciences, University of Berne, Baltzerstrasse 1+3, CH-3012 Berne, Switzerland
4 Environmental Sciences, University of Geneva, Chemin de Drize 7, CH-1227 Carouge-Geneva, Switzerland
5 Federal Office for the Environment, Hazard Prevention Division, CH-3003 Bern, Switzerland
6 Cemagref Grenoble, 2 Rue de la Papeterie, B.P. 76, F-38402 Saint Martin d’Hères Cedex, France


   Abstract

Studies on tree reaction after wounding were so far based on artificial wounding or chemical treatment. For the first time, type, spread and intensity of anatomical responses were analyzed and quantified in naturally disturbed Larix decidua Mill., Picea abies (L.) Karst. and Abies alba Mill. trees. The consequences of rockfall impacts on increment growth were assessed at the height of the wounds, as well as above and below the injuries. A total of 16 trees were selected on rockfall slopes, and growth responses following 54 wounding events were analyzed on 820 cross-sections. Anatomical analysis focused on the occurrence of tangential rows of traumatic resin ducts (TRD) and on the formation of reaction wood. Following mechanical disturbance, TRD production was observed in 100% of L. decidua and P. abies wounds. The radial extension of TRD was largest at wound height, and they occurred more commonly above, rather than below, the wounds. For all species, an intra-annual radial shift of TRD was observed with increasing axial distance from wounds. Reaction wood was formed in 87.5% of A. alba following wounding, but such cases occurred only in 7.7% of L. decidua. The results demonstrate that anatomical growth responses following natural mechanical disturbance differ significantly from the reactions induced by artificial stimuli or by decapitation. While the types of reactions remain comparable between the species, their intensity, spread and persistence disagree considerably. We also illustrate that the external appearance of wounds does not reflect an internal response intensity. This study reveals that disturbance induced under natural conditions triggers more intense and more widespread anatomical responses than that induced under artificial stimuli, and that experimental laboratory tests considerably underestimate tree response.

Keywords: Abies alba, Larix decidua, Picea abies, reaction wood rockfall, tangential rows of traumatic resin ducts, wood anatomy

Received April 21, 2009; Accepted July 1, 2009


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.