Skip Navigation

Tree Physiology 2002 22(15-16):1157-1166; doi:10.1093/treephys/22.15-16.1157
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tissue, D. T.
Right arrow Articles by Anderson, O. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tissue, D. T.
Right arrow Articles by Anderson, O. R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2002 Heron Publishing—Victoria Canada

Leaf respiration at different canopy positions in sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua) grown in ambient and elevated concentrations of carbon dioxide in the field

David T. Tissue1,2, James D. Lewis3, Stan D. Wullschleger4, Jeffery S. Amthor4, Kevin L. Griffin5 and O. Roger Anderson5

1 Department of Biology, Texas Tech University Lubbock, TX 79409-3131, USA
2 Author to whom correspondence should be addresseddavid.tissue{at}ttu.edu
3 Louis Calder Center—Biological Station and Department of Biological Sciences, Fordham University Armonk, NY 10504, USA
4 Environmental Sciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory Oak Ridge, TN 37831, USA
5 Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory of Columbia University Palisades, NY 10964, USA


   Abstract

Trees exposed to elevated CO2 partial pressure ([CO2]) generally show increased rates of photosynthesis and growth, but effects on leaf respiration are more variable. The causes of this variable response are unresolved. We grew 12-year-old sweetgum trees (Liquidambar styraciflua L.) in a Free-Air CO2 Enrichment (FACE) facility in ambient [CO2] (37/44 Pa daytime/nighttime) and elevated [CO2] (57/65 Pa daytime/nighttime) in native soil at Oak Ridge National Environmental Research Park. Nighttime respiration (RN) was measured on leaves in the upper and lower canopy in the second (1999) and third (2000) growing seasons of CO2 fumigation. Leaf respiration in the light (RL) was estimated by the technique of Brooks and Farquhar (1985) in the upper canopy during the third growing season. There were no significant short-term effects of elevated [CO2] on RN or long-term effects on RN or RL, when expressed on an area, mass or nitrogen (N) basis. Upper-canopy leaves had 54% higher RN (area basis) than lower-canopy leaves, but this relationship was unaffected by CO2 growth treatment. In August 2000, RL was about 40% of RN in the upper canopy. Elevated [CO2] significantly increased the number of leaf mitochondria (62%), leaf mass per unit area (LMA; 9%), and leaf starch (31%) compared with leaves in ambient [CO2]. Upper-canopy leaves had a significantly higher number of mitochondria (73%), N (53%), LMA (38%), sugar (117%) and starch (23%) than lower-canopy leaves. Growth in elevated [CO2] did not affect the relationships (i.e., intercept and slope) between RN and the measured leaf characteristics. Although no factor explained more than 45% of the variation in RN, leaf N and LMA were the best predictors for RN. Therefore, the response of RN to CO2 treatment and canopy position was largely dependent on the magnitude of the effect of elevated [CO2] or canopy position on these characteristics. Because elevated [CO2] had little or no effect on N or LMA, there was no effect on RN. Canopy position had large effects on these leaf characteristics, however, such that upper-canopy leaves exhibited higher RN than lower-canopy leaves. We conclude that elevated [CO2] does not directly impact leaf respiration in sweetgum and that barring changes in leaf nitrogen or leaf chemical composition, long-term effects of elevated [CO2] on respiration in this species will be minimal.

Keywords: carbohydrates, cytochrome c oxidase, daytime respiration, forest trees, Free-Air CO2 Enrichment (FACE), nighttime respiration, number of mitochondria

Received September 18, 2001; Accepted March 8, 2002


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Tree PhysiolHome page
L. P. Mullin, S. C. Sillett, G. W. Koch, K. P. Tu, and M. E. Antoine
Physiological consequences of height-related morphological variation in Sequoia sempervirens foliage
Tree Physiol, August 1, 2009; 29(8): 999 - 1010.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
A. D. B. Leakey, E. A. Ainsworth, C. J. Bernacchi, A. Rogers, S. P. Long, and D. R. Ort
Elevated CO2 effects on plant carbon, nitrogen, and water relations: six important lessons from FACE
J. Exp. Bot., July 1, 2009; 60(10): 2859 - 2876.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
N. Gomez-Casanovas, E. Blanc-Betes, M. A. Gonzalez-Meler, and J. Azcon-Bieto
Changes in Respiratory Mitochondrial Machinery and Cytochrome and Alternative Pathway Activities in Response to Energy Demand Underlie the Acclimation of Respiration to Elevated CO2 in the Invasive Opuntia ficus-indica
Plant Physiology, September 1, 2007; 145(1): 49 - 61.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
M. A. GONZALEZ-MELER, L. TANEVA, and R. J. TRUEMAN
Plant Respiration and Elevated Atmospheric CO2 Concentration: Cellular Responses and Global Significance
Ann. Bot., November 1, 2004; 94(5): 647 - 656.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
P. A. Davey, S. Hunt, G. J. Hymus, E. H. DeLucia, B. G. Drake, D. F. Karnosky, and S. P. Long
Respiratory Oxygen Uptake Is Not Decreased by an Instantaneous Elevation of [CO2], But Is Increased with Long-Term Growth in the Field at Elevated [CO2]
Plant Physiology, January 1, 2004; 134(1): 520 - 527.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.